What Does My Baby Look Like at 5 Weeks in Womb

(Natural News) A shocking new report published in the New England Journal of Medicine reveals that when pregnant women are given covid vaccinations during their starting time or second trimesters, they suffer an 82% spontaneous abortion rate, killing iv out of 5 unborn babies.

This stunning finding, explained below, is self-axiomatic from the data published in a new study entitled, "Preliminary Findings of mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine Rubber in Pregnant Persons." Only as disturbing as the data is the fact that the report authors manifestly sought to deliberately obfuscate the truth nigh vaccines causing spontaneous abortions by obfuscating numbers in their own calculations.

Originally brought to our attending by a Life Site News commodity, we checked with our own scientific discipline contacts to review the data and double cheque all the math. In doing so, we were able to confirm 2 things:

1. Yes, the report shows an 82% rate of spontaneous abortions in expectant mothers given covid vaccines during their first or second trimesters.
2. Yes, the study authors either deliberately sought to hide this fact with quack obfuscation (explained below) or they are incompetent and fabricated a glaring error that brings into question their credibility.

In other words, this study was virtually certainly a cover-upward to try to merits vaccinating pregnant women is perfectly safe. Only the report data actually testify quite the oppose.

Here's how:

700 of the 827 women were vaccinated in the third trimester

Tabular array 4 from the study, shown beneath, reveals that a total of 827 pregnant women were studied. Out of the 827 women, 700 of them received their first vaccine in their third trimester of pregnancy. This means 127 women (which is 827 – 700) received a vaccine during their showtime or second trimesters. (You lot have to read the fine print below the tabular array to see this disclosure.)

Out of the 127 women receiving vaccines during their showtime or 2d trimesters, 104 spontaneous abortions occurred before their pregnancies hitting the twenty-week mark. These are indicated as "spontaneous abortions" in the table.

In simple math, 104 spontaneous abortions (during the first xx weeks) out of 127 women who received vaccines in their offset or second trimesters calculates to an 82% charge per unit of spontaneous abortions among these pregnant women who were vaccinated.

Information technology is important to note that deaths of unborn babies during the tertiary trimester are known as "stillbirths" and not spontaneous abortions. Thus, the spontaneous abortions could not have possibly occurred in women vaccinated during their third trimester, past definition.

Thus, the report authors dishonestly used the wrong denominator of 827 in their "spontaneous abortions" adding, when they should take used a denominator of 127, which is the number of women receiving vaccines during their get-go or 2d trimesters.

Put another manner, it is incommunicable for a woman who was vaccinated for the first fourth dimension during her third trimester to have a "spontaneous abortion" in the beginning twenty weeks, since they weren't vaccinated during the first xx weeks (and pregnant women aren't time travelers). Thus, those women shouldn't be included in the denominator used to calculate the spontaneous abortion charge per unit.

The authors of this study should receive an honour in the category of, "How to lie with statistics," because they obviously tried to pull a sleight-of-hand trick to make information technology appear that vaccines are safe for meaning women. In reality, they seem to be killing more than than 4 out of 5 unborn babies in the offset 20 weeks of gestation, at least in this data set up. (Information technology'south a small set of 127 meaning women, and then we'd like to run across a larger review of many thousands of pregnancies in order to get a more clear picture.)

Apples and oranges, lemons and limes

A elementary way to explicate this with a metaphor is to imagine a purse of 50 lemons and l limes, with a science report asking the question, "What per centum of lemons are yellowish?" The scientists count all the yellow fruit and reach the number 50. They mistakenly divide fifty into 100 because there are 100 total piece of fruit, then they declare, "50% of lemons are yellow" because it's 50/100.

But the other 50 pieces of fruit tin't peradventure be included because they're limes, not lemons. So the correct math is 50/50, which ways 100% of the lemons are yellow. That'south the correct respond.

In this science paper, they are using 827 as the denominator, fifty-fifty when 700 out of those 827 women were just vaccinated in the third trimester, which is long by the time window during which a "spontaneous abortion" can occur. And since meaning women aren't time travelers, they can't go back in time and report a spontaneous abortion from months before.

If vaccine scientists either can't practise this basic math — or are willfully deceiving the world with dishonest obfuscation of the numbers — so "scientific discipline" has already failed its core hope: to offer "evidence-based" conclusions to sympathise the world around us.

Nevertheless when 4 out of 5 pregnant women lose their babies in the first twenty weeks, these scientists falsely claim the spontaneous abortion rate is only 12.6%. Why? Because they're covering up the atrocities of the vaccine for political reasons, most likely.

In fact, the key author of the study, Tom T. Shimabukuro, is likewise named in numerous other studies that claim to document agin reactions in various vaccines, ranging from rotavirus vaccines to the H1N1 vaccine from 2009. Information technology raises the obvious question: Did Shimabukuro brand the same error in other studies that concluded vaccines posed no meaning gamble of adverse events? For example, hither'due south another study he co-authored: "Agin events after Fluzone ® Intradermal vaccine reported to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), 2011-2013."

That study ended, "Review of VAERS reports did not identify any new or unexpected safety concerns afterward TIV-ID."

But is that decision based on bad math, like the study on covid vaccines given to meaning women? We call for a review of all his methods and conclusions. Perchance this same study architect has made the same systematic error (or possibly a deliberate obfuscation) for many years, spanning many previous studies. It wouldn't be the first time one writer was found to have made systematic mistakes across dozens of papers and is forced to retract them.

And isn't that what the "scientific method" demands? Peer review. Double checking the math. Admitting to mistakes in conclusions. This is how science progresses, by pointing out errors and demanding they be addressed and corrected. We can't just accept bad math and call it "science" when the bad math doesn't cheque out.

Fasten protein injections into pregnant women an "atrocity," warns Dr. Peter McCullough

In the mean time, it's clear that 4 out of v pregnancies are being terminated by covid vaccines when those vaccines are given during the offset 20 weeks (at least, according to the small data set nosotros have and so far). And that means the "depopulation" aspects of the covid vaccine are working exactly as globalists hoped they would.

Remember: Bio-distribution studies (pharmacokinetics) show that covid vaccine spike proteins directly attack reproductive organs such as the ovaries. Given that spike proteins are engineered biological weapons designed to interfere with human cells, information technology should be no surprise any that they are achieving a loftier rate of spontaneous abortions in significant women.

I recently interviewed Dr. Peter McCullough, an internal medicine proficient and editor of two medical journals. Although he does non characterize this equally a depopulation agenda, he agrees that these vaccines are attacking significant women and causing more than 80% of unborn babies to exist aborted. He calls it an "barbarism" and says the pushing of these vaccines on pregnant women is "shameful." You tin can hear him in his own words in the following interview:

Brighteon.com/fc2aa0fe-eae0-4c32-bc23-47e6b6ab9d97

All this ways that alive births may collapse by iii.2 one thousand thousand over the next year, in the United states alone, if every significant woman is vaccinated during the first twenty weeks of pregnancy. The number of unborn babies being murdered in the womb, in this case, is reaching "holocaust" levels, which is why this is being called a medical "atrocity."

The fields of medicine and science have turned against humanity. They are at present killing babies by the millions and injecting adults with spike protein bioweapons that are causing strokes, center attacks, deaths and lifelong injury.

The vaccine industry is at war with the human being race. And alive-born babies are their enemy. Joe Biden's land management czar once characterized man children equally an "environmental hazard."

This is a state of war. A bioweapons attack. And it goes beyond mere "crimes confronting humanity." It is a spiritual expose of the entire homo race past the institutions of science and medicine, both of which long pretended to be motivated by a desire to assistance humanity, but are at present clearly shown to exist working towards humanity'due south destruction.

Acquire more in today's listen-opening Situation Update podcast:

Brighteon.com/89677c54-51e3-4139-9af1-093fe160a3a1

Hear a new podcast each weekday at:

https://www.brighteon.com/channels/hrreport

millerlostow.blogspot.com

Source: https://www.naturalnews.com/2021-07-01-depopulation-alert-shocking-new-study-reveals-covid-vaccine-terminates-4-out-of-5-pregnancies-via-spontaneous-abortions.html